Psychological Factors on Teacher Education in Buddhist Sunday Schools in Lampung
I Ketut Damana
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/psychologia.v3i1.12Kata Kunci:
Psychology, Teacher, EducationAbstrak
The aim of this research is to understand the psychological factors of teacher educators at the Lampung Buddhist Sunday School. The method used is a penomenological study, collecting data by finding data sources and recreating from various sources such as books, journals and existing research. The result is that psychological factors in teacher educators with research designs whose findings are not obtained from the form of calculations, but aim to reveal phenomenology in a holistic-contextual manner by collecting data from natural backgrounds and utilizing research as the key instrument. Research on psychological factors has a descriptive nature and tends to use an inductive analysis approach, so that processes and meanings based on the subject's perspective are more prominent in psychological factors, therefore psychological factors in meditation teachers in research are easy to understand by leaders and schools Buddhist week
Referensi
Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 308–319.
Allen, M. (2017). The SAGE encyclopedia of communication research methods. SAGE publications.
Baker, L. (2006). Observation: A complex research method. Library Trends, 55(1), 171–189.
Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning—A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27(6), 12–26.
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996). Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. Physical Review A, 54(5), 3824.
Boylan, A. M. (1988). Sunday school: The formation of an American institution, 1790-1880. Yale University Press.
Chapman, J. W. (1988). Cognitive-motivational characteristics and academic achievement of learning disabled children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 357.
Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. Naming the Mind, 1–224.
De la Fuente, J., Sander, P., Martínez-Vicente, J. M., Vera, M., Garzón, A., & Fadda, S. (2017). Combined effect of levels in personal self-regulation and regulatory teaching on meta-cognitive, on meta-motivational, and on academic achievement variables in undergraduate students. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 245776.
Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. Teachers College Record, 5(6), 9–30.
Entwistle, N. J. (2013). Styles of learning and teaching: An integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. David Fulton Publishers.
Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39(2), 93.
Gorman, G. E., Clayton, P. R., Shep, S. J., & Clayton, A. (2005). Qualitative research for the information professional: A practical handbook. Facet Publishing.
Heath, S. B. (1988). Ever-Shifting Oral and Literate Traditions. Perspectives on Literacy, 348–370.
Hyun, C. C., Wijayanti, L. M., Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., Santoso, P. B., Igak, W., Bernarto, I., & Pramono, R. (2020). Implementation of contextual teaching and learning (CTL) to improve the concept and practice of love for faith-learning integration. International Journal of Control and Automation, 13(1), 365–383.
Johnson, R. (2007). ‘Really useful knowledge’: Radical education and working-class culture 1790–1848. In CCCS Selected Working Papers (pp. 769–796). Routledge.
Kendall-Tackett, K. A., Williams, L. M., & Finkelhor, D. (1993). Impact of sexual abuse on children: a review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Psychological Bulletin, 113(1), 164.
Lauder, M., & Lauder, A. F. (2017). Place Names and Cultural Heritage in an Archipelagic Country.
Marler, P. L., & Hadaway, C. K. (2014). Back to the future: Why the Sunday school is key to denominational identity and growth. Review & Expositor, 111(1), 17–32.
Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1999). Schools as knowledge-building organizations. Today’s Children, Tomorrow’s Society: The Developmental Health and Wealth of Nations, 274–289.
Slavin, R. E. (1980). Effects of student teams and peer tutoring on academic achievement and time on-task. The Journal of Experimental Education, 48(4), 252–258.
Smith, S. E. (2010). To be wise and kind: A Buddhist community engagement with Victorian state primary schools.
Wei, R. C., Darling-Hammond, L., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession. A Status Report on Teacher Development in the United States and Abroad. Dallas, Tx: National Staff Development Council.
Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational psychology. Pearson.
Yoon, S. A., Elinich, K., Wang, J., Steinmeier, C., & Tucker, S. (2012). Using augmented reality and knowledge-building scaffolds to improve learning in a science museum. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7, 519–541.
Young, J. C., Rose, D. C., Mumby, H. S., Benitez‐Capistros, F., Derrick, C. J., Finch, T., Garcia, C., Home, C., Marwaha, E., & Morgans, C. (2018). A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 9(1), 10–19.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 I Ketut Damana
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
