The Influence of Hybrid Work Patterns on Organizational Engagement and Work Stress
Keywords:
Hybrid work, Organizational engagement, Work stress, Flexibility, AutonomyAbstract
This study investigates the influence of hybrid work patterns on organizational engagement and work stress among employees in organizations that have adopted flexible work systems after the COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence of hybrid work combining remote and in-office arrangements has transformed organizational culture, communication, and performance management, raising critical questions about its impact on employee well-being and commitment. Using a quantitative research design, data were collected through Likert-scale questionnaires measuring hybrid work flexibility, engagement (using the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale), and stress (using the Perceived Stress Scale). The data were analyzed using regression and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine the relationships between variables. The results indicate that hybrid work flexibility significantly enhances organizational engagement by increasing employees’ sense of autonomy and control over their work. However, excessive remote working and poorly structured flexibility contribute to higher levels of work stress due to blurred boundaries and social isolation. Moderating variables such as work-life balance, social support, and leadership style were also identified as influential in shaping these outcomes. The study concludes that hybrid work has both empowering and challenging aspects boosting engagement when autonomy is balanced with clear communication and organizational support, yet increasing stress when boundaries and connections are neglected. The findings suggest that organizations should implement hybrid policies that promote engagement, psychological well-being, and structured flexibility to achieve sustainable performance. This research contributes to the literature by integrating the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model, Self-Determination Theory, and Social Exchange Theory to explain how hybrid work environments influence employee motivation and stress regulation in the modern workplace.
References
Agarwal, B., Brooks, S. K., & Greenberg, N. (2020). The role of peer support in managing occupational stress: a qualitative study of the sustaining resilience at work intervention. Workplace Health & Safety, 68(2), 57–64.
Babapour Chafi, M., Hultberg, A., & Bozic Yams, N. (2021). Post-pandemic office work: Perceived challenges and opportunities for a sustainable work environment. Sustainability, 14(1), 294.
Cacciattolo, M. (2015). Ethical considerations in research. In The Praxis of English Language Teaching and Learning (PELT) (pp. 55–73). Brill.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2013). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
Diab-Bahman, R., & Al-Enzi, A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on conventional work settings. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(9/10), 909–927.
Emre, O., & De Spiegeleare, S. (2021). The role of work–life balance and autonomy in the relationship between commuting, employee commitment and well-being. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(11), 2443–2467.
Evans-Uzosike, I. O., Okatta, C. G., Otokiti, B. O., & Gift, O. (n.d.). Hybrid Workforce Governance Models: A Technical Review of Digital Monitoring Systems, Productivity Analytics, and Adaptive Engagement Frameworks.
Grzegorczyk, M., Mariniello, M., Nurski, L., & Schraepen, T. (2021). Blending the physical and virtual: a hybrid model for the future of work. Bruegel Policy Contribution.
Kapoor, V., Yadav, J., Bajpai, L., & Srivastava, S. (2021). Perceived stress and psychological well-being of working mothers during COVID-19: A mediated moderated roles of teleworking and resilience. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 43(6), 1290–1309.
Kim, S., & Christensen, A. L. (2017). The dark and bright sides of personal use of technology at work: A job demands–resources model. Human Resource Development Review, 16(4), 425–447.
Lamprinou, V. D. I., Tasoulis, K., & Kravariti, F. (2021). The impact of servant leadership and perceived organisational and supervisor support on job burnout and work–life balance in the era of teleworking and COVID-19. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(7), 1071–1088.
Martinez-Amador, J. (2016). Remote and on-site knowledge worker productivity and engagement: a comparative study of the effect of virtual intensity and work location preference. Case Western Reserve University.
Miller, C. A., Guidry, J. P. D., Dahman, B., & Thomson, M. D. (2020). A tale of two diverse qualtrics samples: information for online survey researchers. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 29(4), 731–735.
Nasomboon, B. (2014). The relationship among leadership commitment, organizational performance, and employee engagement. International Business Research, 7(9), 77.
Negulescu, O. H., & Doval, E. (2021). Ergonomics and time management in remote working from home. Acta Technica Napocensis-Series: Applied Mathematics, Mechanics, and Engineering, 64(1-S1).
Ng, T. W. H., Butts, M. M., Vandenberg, R. J., DeJoy, D. M., & Wilson, M. G. (2006). Effects of management communication, opportunity for learning, and work schedule flexibility on organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 474–489.
Radonić, M., Vukmirović, V., & Milosavljević, M. (2021). The impact of hybrid workplace models on intangible assets: The case of an emerging country. Amfiteatru Economic, 23(58), 770–786.
Schaufeli, W. B. (2018). Work engagement in Europe: Relations with national economy, governance and culture. Organizational Dynamics, 47(2), 99–106.
Schmitt, J. B., Breuer, J., & Wulf, T. (2021). From cognitive overload to digital detox: Psychological implications of telework during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106899.
Setiawan, R., Kulkarni, V. D., Upadhyay, Y. K., Jain, V., Mishra, R., Yu, S. Y., & Raisal, I. (2020). The Influence Work-Life Policies Can Have on Part-Time Employees in Contrast to Full-Time Workers and The Consequence It Can Have on Their Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Motivation. Petra Christian University.
Srikanth, K., & Puranam, P. (2014). The firm as a coordination system: Evidence from software services offshoring. Organization Science, 25(4), 1253–1271.
Stranzl, J., Wolfgruber, D., Einwiller, S., & Brockhaus, J. (2021). Keeping up the spirit. Internal communication in an increasingly virtual work environment. Communication Insights.
Timms, C., Brough, P., O’Driscoll, M., Kalliath, T., Siu, O. L., Sit, C., & Lo, D. (2015). Flexible work arrangements, work engagement, turnover intentions and psychological health. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 53(1), 83–103.
Tortia, E. C. (2008). Worker well-being and perceived fairness: Survey-based findings from Italy. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 37(5), 2080–2094.
Wilson, C. (2020). High-Performance Work Systems: Examining the Differences in Traditional and Nontraditional Work Environments. Capella University.
Xie, J. L., Elangovan, A. R., Hu, J., & Hrabluik, C. (2019). Charting new terrain in work design: A study of hybrid work characteristics. Applied Psychology, 68(3), 479–512.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hugo Olaus, Annelie Veronica, Alfred Alfred
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
